Parental Rights & Child Abuse Prevention

The Parental Rights Foundation is grateful for those professionals and organizations who work to prevent child abuse and neglect. With them, we believe no one has a right to abuse or neglect a child.

Yet we would also caution that the system designed to prevent abuse and neglect can sometimes become the worst offender.

Every child abuse investigation involves intrusion into a child’s family and can have life-changing consequences. Yet, up to 83% of all investigations are ultimately concluded to have involved no abuse or neglect—only innocent families[1].

 

In a concurring opinion in Demaree v. Pederson, Ninth Circuit Judge Berzon added her own emphasis on the trauma that comes of removing children from their homes unnecessarily. Quoting from Rosalind Folman’s “I Was Tooken”: How Children Express Removal from Their Parents Preliminary to Placement into Foster Care (1998), Berzon wrote,

“The events of the day of placement constitute a crisis for children because everything in their lives changes and the children are overwhelmed with feelings of abandonment, rejection, worthlessness, guilt, and helplessness.”

Berzon also wrote, “Research confirms that ‘unexpectedly being snatched by the police or protective service workers traumatize[s]…children’,” citing the same source. “For small children especially,” Berzon concluded (in her own words),

“being taken from a home and family by a stranger is a profoundly frightening and destabilizing experience, even if that home and family are flawed.”

This is also the point of the amicus brief which we filed recently in Doe v. Woodard.

Children must be protected from abuse and neglect. But many more children can be spared unnecessary trauma if we can protect the rights of innocent parents to lead their own families and especially to not be separated from their children without serious cause.

The best child welfare investigators know and understand this, too[2]. They know the best place for a child is with the parent if that is at all possible, and that separation is seen as a last resort. This high respect for the role of the family and the rights of parents to act as their child’s first defense is the best way to protect all children not only from maltreatment at home, but from abusive intervention by the state.


[1] Children’s Bureau, Child Maltreatment 2016 (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, 2018), https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment.

[2] Goldstein, Joseph, Anna Freud, and Albert Solnit, Before the Best Interest of the Child (New York: The Free Press, 1977), pp. 4-5: “We believe that a child’s need for continuity of care by autonomous parents requires acknowledging that parents should generally be entitled to raise their children as they think best, free of state interference. This conviction finds expression in our preference for minimum state intervention and prompts restraint in defining justifications for coercively intruding on family relationships….So long as a child is a member of a functioning family, his paramount interest lies in the preservation of his family.” Goldstein’s trilogy remains the gold standard for quality child welfare investigation guidelines.

Learn More About Parental Rights & Child Abuse

Be an Informed Parent.

Please join our email list to stay informed of parental rights issues.

Thanks to our generous partners, we're able to keep an eye on what is happening in the area of parental rights. Here are some stories related to the negative effects of removing a child from his or her parents and how while there are legitimate reasons to remove children from their parents, too often such removals occur needlessly, resulting in serious negative consequences for the child.

We have also included articles related to the success of other options besides removal and on how removals are impacting families.

Note: Parental Rights Foundations does not necessarily agree with all views expressed in these articles. They are provided here to give a glimpse into what is happening in the news.

Negative Consequences of Removal on a Child

  • Termination of Parental Rights: What’s The Rush? - "If a parent is unfit and cannot care for his child, we should automatically terminate his parental rights. Right? Well, maybe not."
  • When Protection Hurts - This heart-felt blog post written by an attorney who works with both children and parents shines light on how painful removing children from their parents--especially emergency removals that are later shown to be unnecessary--can be.

    "I frequently recall one child who was asked to draw himself as a superhero. I asked him what his power would be, 'When I grow up, my superpower is going to be to keep families together,' he said. 'So no kid has to go through what I am going through right now.'"

  • Foster Care vs. Keeping Families Together: The Definitive Studies - This article discusses several studies, including one by the University of Minnesota, that highlight the negative affect foster care can have.

    "These studies found thousands of children already in foster care who would have done better had child protection agencies not taken them away in the first place."

  • Child Protection and Adult Crime: Using Investigator Assignment to Estimate Causal Effects of Foster Care

    "Children on the margin of placement are found to be two to three times more likely to enter the criminal justice system as adults if they were placed in foster care."

  • Child Protection and Child Outcomes: Measuring the Effects of Foster Care

    "...children on the margin of placement tend to have better outcomes when they remain at home, especially for older children."

  • Children in Foster Care: Issues and Concerns - While this article is written for psychiatrists, it points out how much foster care children struggle even as adults.

    [T]he consequences of trauma exposure and the current realities of the broader systems of care leave them ill-equipped to engage in independent decision-making. These young adults are more likely to engage in behaviors that increase their odds of inpatient psychiatric care and criminal justice involvement.

Success of Other Options Besides Removal

There are solutions out there that many haven't thought of to keep families together while getting parents the help they need.

Investigations Are Impacting Innocent Families